Customary-Based Restorative Justice: Philosophical Foundations and Normative Relevance in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v4i12.460Keywords:
Restorative Justice, Customary Justice, Legal Norms.Abstract
The phenomenon of legal pluralism in Indonesia demonstrates the tension between customary justice rooted in local wisdom and the positive criminal law system dominated by retributive principles. This conflict often neglects the restorative dimension, where the resolution of criminal acts emphasizes the restoration of social relations rather than mere punishment. This research aims to uncover the philosophical foundations of customary-based restorative justice, while assessing its normative relevance in the context of national criminal justice. A normative juridical approach is applied through a philosophical examination of concepts such as social harmony in the Aristotelian tradition and the value of forgiveness in local culture, combined with an analysis of Indonesian legal norms. This study integrates customary ethical perspectives with modern principles of justice to evaluate how custom can become a more inclusive mechanism for criminal accountability. The research finds that customary restorative justice is philosophically grounded in culturally-based legal certainty and socially legitimate when aligned with constitutional principles, proportionality, and human rights. The 2023 New Criminal Code’s recognition of living law (Article 2) provides a formal basis for integrating customary mechanisms, which prioritize dialogue and reconciliation, thereby enhancing systemic effectiveness. This study contributes to legal reform by advocating for the formal inclusion of customary justice as a complementary approach that enriches Indonesia’s legal pluralism without compromising legality. The findings offer insights for developing more contextually just policies.
References
Agusta, D., Madjid, A., & Aprilianda, N. (2025). Reforming Indonesian criminal law: Integrating supervision, punishment, and rehabilitation for restorative justice. International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM), 7(1), 54–68.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik kriminal Indonesia 2024. BPS RI.
Day, A., Casey, S., Gerace, A., Oster, C., & O’Kane, D. (2018). The forgotten victims: Prisoner experience of victimisation and engagement with the criminal justice system.
Farida, Q. A. S. (2025). Transforming criminal justice system through restorative justice approach in the new National Criminal Code. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 221, p. 03004). EDP Sciences.
Gavrielides, T. (2017). Restorative justice: Ideals and realities. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315264868
Hadi, A. M., Iftitah, A., & Alamsyah, S. (2023). Restorative justice through strengthening community legal culture in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunity. Mulawarman Law Review. https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v8i1.1140
Harefa, B., Fernando, Z. J., Maharani, A. D., Anditya, A. W., & Humana, S. (2024). Revitalization of Indonesian criminal law through the acknowledgment of living law: An investigation of the Sigajang Laleng Lipa’ customary law. Jurnal Hukum Novelty. https://doi.org/10.26555/jhn.v15i2.28234
Kawalek, A., Edwards, M., & Best, D. (2019). Recovery and restorative justice: Systems for generating social justice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315613512
Ma’Ruffi, R. E. Z. A., Abdullah, A. G., & Sudiro, A. (2025). Restorative justice in police authority: Part of the restoration paradigm in the Indonesian criminal justice system. TPM–Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(2–June), 784–790.
Manalu, J., Anggusti, M., & Tambunan, D. (2024). Enforcement of the principle of legality to living law as legal basis in the positivism of displacement customary law. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v4i2.716
Omowon, A., & Kunlere, A. S. (2024). Restorative justice practices: Bridging the gap between offenders and victims effectively. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.3.3978
Philona, R., & Awaludin, A. (2025). Constitutional values and restorative justice: A critical analysis in the Indonesian context. KARSA Journal of Social and Islamic Culture, 33(1), 241–271.
Rahawarin, F., Wattimena, H., Fadhil, M., Ramsay, S., & Aindo, L. O. (2025). Restorative justice at the grassroots: Exploring cultural integration and police facilitation in criminal case settlements in Waesala, Indonesia. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 24(1), 6705–6725.
Riyadi, P. (2025). Building bridges of justice: Restorative justice reconstruction with the Indonesian criminal system after Law No. 1 of 2023. Rechtsvinding Journal of Legal Renewal, 2(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v2i2.155
Rochaeti, N., & Muthia, N. (2021). Socio-legal study of community participation in restorative justice of children in conflict with the law in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10(1), 293–298.
Steinmetz, C. H. D. (2025). Non-Western and Western theories of peace. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1208.19180
Suryawati, N., & Syaputri, M. D. (2021). Harmonization of the application of customary law and positive law in village communities of Malang Regency. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v6i2.993
Syamsuddin, Hartiwiningsih, & Rustamaji, M. (2024). Criminalization of criminal acts based on living law in regional regulations in Indonesia. Journal of Ecohumanism. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i6.4156
Weeks, S. M. (2021). Constitutionally transforming South Africa by amalgamating customary and common law: Ramuhovhi, the proprietary consequences of marriage and land as property. Constitutional Court Review. https://doi.org/10.2989/ccr.2021.0007
Widjajanto, A., Astawa, I. G. P., & Rulyandi, M. (2025). Decolonising restorative justice in Indonesia: A comparative study across customary law traditions. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(2), 470–492.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dheny Wahyudhi, Herlambang Herlambang, Elly Sudarti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
