Juridical Overview of Misappropriation of Medical Devices Procurement Budget By Hospitals

Authors

  • Leti Ratna Kusumawati Universitas Borobudur
  • Zudan Arief Fakrulloh Universitas Borobudur
  • Evita Isretno Israhadi Universitas Borobudur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v1i05.45

Keywords:

Procurement of Goods and Services, Hospital, Corruption

Abstract

The existence of corruption in Indonesia is alarming, the increase in corruption cases has brought misery to the community so its existence must be eradicated. The Corruption Eradication Commission as the institution for eradicating corruption in Indonesia must be responsive and participate in supervising every activity related to budgeting for state needs, to ensure the actual realization of budgeting. Based on the Decree of the Head of the Madiun District Health Office Number: 188.45/1464/KPTS/402.102/2011, the judge considered that the actions taken by the defendant fulfilled all the elements of Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph ( 1) item 1 of the Criminal Code (KUHP). Even though the Public Prosecutor charged the defendant with Article 2 of Law Number 20 of 2001, the Judge considered that the Public Prosecutor could not prove the "unlawful" element of what the defendant did. Therefore, based on facts and analogies, the Judge judged that Article 3 was appropriate to be applied. The application of criminal sanctions against people as perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption is what has been regulated in Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001. However, the formulation of sanctions in several articles in Law Number 20 of 2001 contradicted the general provisions regarding sanctions regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP).

References

Ali, Achmad. (2002). Menguak Tabir Hukum Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis. Google Scholar

Arifin, Johan, & Hartadi, Toni. (2020). The implementation of probity audit to prevent fraud in public procurement of goods and services for government agencies. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 11–21. Google Scholar

Danil, Elwi. (2021). Korupsi: Konsep, Tindak Pidana Dan Pemberantasannya-Rajawali Pers. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada. Google Scholar

Handoyo, Eko. (2014). Korupsi Dan Pembangunan. Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia, 78722. Google Scholar

Ifrani, Ifrani. (2018). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Kejahatan Luar Biasa. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 9(3), 319–336. Google Scholar

Rachman, Brian Lemuel. (2018). Tinjauan Hukum Atas Sanksi Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Kejahatan Luar Biasa di Indonesia. Lex Et Societatis, 6(2). Google Scholar

Syamsuddin, Aziz. (2011). Tindak Pidana kHusus, Sinar Grafika. Jakarta. Google Scholar

Tandiono, Sukur. (2021). ANALISIS PUTUSAN TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA ALAT KESEHATAN YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 970 K/PID. SUS/2014). Kumpulan Karya Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Sosial Sains, 1(01). Google Scholar

Wibowo, Ari. (2020). Penentuan Kriteria Unsur Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan). Jurnal Yuridis Vol, 7(1), 120–148. Google Scholar

Wiyono, R. (2006). Discussion of Corruption Eradication Act. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, Cet, 2. Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2023-01-15