Review of Theory of Legal Objectives on Article 31 Section (1) and (2) of Law Number 37 Of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations

Authors

  • Bagus Rahman Universitas Borobudu
  • Ahmad Redi Universitas Borobudur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v1i05.42

Keywords:

bankruptcy, criminal confiscation, general confiscation, assets

Abstract

The bankruptcy case of PT Aliga Internasional Pratama is proof of the dualism of the position of criminal confiscation over general confiscation in the bankruptcy estate. Based on the decision of the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court, PT. Aliga International Pratama has been legally declared bankrupt with all the legal consequences. Whereas as of the date of the bankruptcy decision, all assets of PT. Aliga is in a state of general confiscation, and the authority to control and manage all of their asset rests with the Curator Team. However, 2 buildings which are bankrupt assets, namely The Aliga Hotel and factory/office buildings, have been confiscated by the Criminal Investigation Police Investigators (Bareskrim Polri).The research method in this paper is descriptive qualitative, namely the legal material obtained is presented descriptively and analyzed qualitatively.

The results showed that, analyzed using the theory of justice according to Thomas Aquinas and the theory of expediency by Jeremy Bentham, the provisions of Article 31 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the UUK have fulfilled the values of justice and expediency in their norms. However, analyzed by Jeremy Bentham's theory of legal certainty, the provisions of Article 31 paragraphs (1) and (2) of the UUK do not meet the value of legal certainty. Then the judge's decision has been right and fulfills the elements of certainty, justice, and legal expediency

References

Afiah, Ratna Nurul, & Hamzah, Andi. (1989). Barang bukti dalam proses pidana. Sinar Grafika. Google Scholar

Andi, Hamzah. (1986). Kamus Hukum. Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta. Google Scholar

Artadi, Ibnu. (2016). Hukum: Antara Nilai-Nilai Kepastian, Kemanfaatan Dan Keadilan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 4(1). Google Scholar

Darmodiharjo, Darji. (1995). Pokok-pokok filsafat hukum: apa dan bagaimana filsafat hukum Indonesia. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Google Scholar

Erwin, Muhammad. (2015). Filsafat hukum: Refleksi Kritis Terhadap Hukum dan Hukum Indonesia (dalam dimensi ide dan aplikasi). Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada. Google Scholar

Fanani, Ahmad Zaenal. (2006). Teori Keadilan dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum dan Islam. Artikel, Hakim PA Martapura. Google Scholar

Friedman, W. (1994). Teori & Filsafat Hukum: Idealisme Filosofis & Problema Keadilan (Susunan II). Rajawali Pers, Jakarta. Google Scholar

Hadi, Shubhan M. (2008). Hukum Kepailitan (Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan). Kencana Prenada Media Group. Jakarta. Google Scholar

Hertanto, Hertanto, Mulyaningsih, Handi, Indrajat, Himawan, & Ulzikri, Ahmad Robi. (2020). Strategi Pendidikan Politik Antipolitik Uang pada Pemilih Pemula dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Lampung Selatan. Google Scholar

Mulyadi, Kartini. (2001). Kepailitan dan Penyelesaian Utang Piutang. Bandung: Alumni. Google Scholar

Prasetyo, Teguh, & Barkatullah, Abdul Halim. (2012). Filsafat, Teori, dan Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Google Scholar

Rachels, James. (2004). Filsafat moral. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 122, 32. Google Scholar

Sumaryono, E. (2000). Etika Hukum (Relevansi Teori Hukum). Yogyakarta. Kanisius. Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2023-01-15