Reconstruction of Conditional Death Penalty Norms In the Perspective of Renewing Indonesian Criminal Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v1i05.35Keywords:
Formulation Poilcy, Conditional Death Penalty, Penal ReformAbstract
Penal reform is something that must be done as a form of adjustment to applicable law with changes in values, times, technology, national and international insights. Death penalty in Indonesia also needs to be updated to adjust these developments, especially in the adjustment of the values adopted by the Indonesian people. This study aims to determine the policy on conditional death penalty formulation in the law currently in force in Indonesia, and analyze the policy formulation of the ideals of conditional death penalty in Indonesia. This research uses a qualitative method with a normative approach. This research results in the fact that the law in Indonesia has not yet regulated the conditional death sentence, so there is still a conflict between those who want to abolish capital punishment and those who want to continue implementing capital punishment. Conditional death penalty is needed as a middle ground between the two groups. Conditional death penalty is also needed as an evaluatif process for prisoners in serving their sentences and respecting human rights in accordance with national and international perspectives
References
Alviolita, Fifink Praiseda, & Arief, Barda Nawawi. (2019). Kebijakan Formulasi Tentang Perumusan Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Law Reform, 15(1), 130–148.
Anjari, Warih. (2015). Penjatuhan Pidana Mati di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Widya Yustisia, 1(2), 247155.
Barus, Zulfadli. (2013). Analisis filosofis tentang peta konseptual penelitian hukum normatif dan penelitian hukum sosiologis. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 13(2), 307–318.
Beltran de Felip, Miguel, & Martin, Adan Nieto. (2012). Post 9/11 Trends in International Judicial Cooperation: Human Rights as a Constraint on Extradition in Death Penalty Cases. J. Int’l Crim. Just., 10, 581.
Bindler, Anna, & Hjalmarsson, Randi. (2020). The persistence of the criminal justice gender gap: Evidence from 200 years of judicial decisions. The Journal of Law and Economics, 63(2), 297–339.
Christianto, Hwian. (2009). Pembaharuan makna asas legalitas. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 39(3), 347–375.
Corteen, Karen, & Steele, Rachael. (2018). A criminal injustice system? Sex offender suspects and defendants. Liverpool Law Review, 39(3), 265–277.
Council, National Research, Nagin, Daniel S., & Pepper, John V. (2012). Deterrence and the death penalty. National Academies Press Washington, DC.
Hood, Roger, & Hoyle, Carolyn. (2015). The death penalty: A worldwide perspective. OUP Oxford.
Irianto, Sulistyowati. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Metodologi Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 32(2), 155–172.
Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra. (2016). Hukum (Sanksi) Pidana Adat Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(2), 123–130.
Khasan, Moh. (2017). Prinsip-prinsip keadilan hukum dalam asas legalitas hukum pidana islam. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 6(1), 21–36.
Kyambalesa, Henry. (2019). The Death Penalty: Arguments For and Against. Available at SSRN 3474715.
Lindsey, Tim. (2017). Indonesian Constitutional Reform: Muddling Towards Democracy. In Public Law in East Asia (pp. 337–363). Routledge.
Maulidah, Khilmatin, & Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra. (2019). Kebijakan formulasi asas permaafan hakim dalam upaya pembaharuan hukum pidana nasional. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 281–293.
Muladi, S. H., Diah Sulistyani, R. S., & SH, C. N. (2021). Kompleksitas Perkembangan Tindak Pidana dan Kebijakan Kriminal. Penerbit Alumni.
Putra, Aista Wisnu, & Sutanti, Rahmi Dwi. (2020). Kebijakan Formulasi Pidana Mati Bersyarat Dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 319–330.
Rado, Rudini Hasyim, Arief, Barda Nawawi, & Soponyono, Eko. (2016). Kebijakan Mediasi Penal Terhadap Penyelesaian Konflik Sara Di Kepulauan Kei Dalam Upaya Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional. Law Reform, 12(2), 266–276.
Toule, Elsa R. M. (2016). Eksistensi Ancaman Pidana Mati Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS, 3(3), 103–110.
Zaini, Ihwan, & NPM, S. H. (2013). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Hukuman Mati Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Upaya Pencarian Kepastian Hukum). Jurnal Nestor Magister Hukum, 2(3), 10543.
Zoomers, Annelies. (2010). Globalisation and the foreignisation of space: seven processes driving the current global land grab. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(2), 429–447.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Joko Cahyono 1, Faisal Santiago2
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
