Law No. 18 Year 2003 Concerning Advocacy: Effectiveness Of Immunity Rights In Defending Clients

Authors

  • Nana Supiana Universitas Borobudur
  • Evita Isretno Israhadi Universitas Borobudur
  • Megawati Barthos Universitas Borobudur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v1i05.31

Keywords:

Advocates, Regulations, Immunity Rights

Abstract

In carrying out their profession, advocates have the right to obtain information, data, and other documents needed to defend the interests of their clients, both from government agencies and other parties related to these interests. Advocates are free and without fear of issuing opinions or statements in court proceedings to defend the case for which they are responsible. Law on Advocates Number 18 of 2003 is to equalize the status of the Advocate profession with other legal professions Advocates as a vital element in the search for material truth in the judicial process, especially from the point of view of the client's legal interests. The regulation is intended to protect the public from legal services provided by advocates that are substandard. Law on Advocates Number 18 of 2003, also provides the right of immunity (immunity) to carry out their professional duties, and the interests of clients who are defended. The regulation regarding the immunity rights of advocates in Law no. 18 of 2003 Law on Advocates.

References

ADJI, H. (1991). Etika Profesional dan Hukum Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dokter, Profesi Dokter.

Arliman, Laurensius. (2015). Notaris dan Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim. Deepublish.

Cahyani, Fenny, Junaidi, Muhammad, Arifin, Zaenal, & Sukarna, Kadi. (2021). Kedudukan Hak Imunitas Advokat Di Indonesia. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 4(1), 146–160.

Caspar, Samantha M., & Joukov, Artem M. (2020). The Case for Abolishing Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity on Equal Protection Grounds. Hofstra L. Rev., 49, 315.

Desclaux, Alice, Badji, Dioumel, Ndione, Albert Gautier, & Sow, Khoudia. (2017). Accepted monitoring or endured quarantine? Ebola contacts’ perceptions in Senegal. Social Science & Medicine, 178, 38–45.

El-Muhtaj, Majda. (2017). Hak asasi manusia dalam konstitusi Indonesia. Prenada Media.

Indonesia, Perhimpunan Advokat. (2007). Kitab Advokat Indonesia, Bandung: PT. Alumni.

Kamilah, Anita. (2021). PENERAPAN PRINSIP ACTIO PAULIANA DALAM KEPAILITAN DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUMNYA TERHADAP PEMBELI YANG BERITIKAD BAIK. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 7(2), 160–176.

Melton, Gary B., Petrila, John, Poythress, Norman G., Slobogin, Christopher, Otto, Randy K., Mossman, Douglas, & Condie, Lois O. (2017). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. Guilford Publications.

Nuna, Muten, Kodai, Dince Aisa, & Moonti, Roy Marthen. (2020). Code Of Ethics And The Role Of Advocates In Providing Legal Aid To The Poor. Indonesian Journal Of Advocacy And Legal Services, 1(2), 259–274.

Primus, Eve Brensike. (2015). Culture as a Structural Problem in Indigent Defense. Minn. L. Rev., 100, 1769.

Purser, Kelly, Cockburn, Tina, Cross, Cassandra, & Jacmon, Helene. (2018). Alleged financial abuse of those under an enduring power of attorney: an exploratory study. British Journal of Social Work, 48(4), 887–905.

Rosyadi, A. Rahmat, & Hartini, Sri. (2003). Advokat dalam perspektif Islam dan hukum positif. Ghalia Indonesia.

Wibowo, Bagus Satrio, Asikin, Zainal, & Amirudin, Amirudin. (2021). Application of Integrated Assessment in Law Enforcement against Narcotics Abusers. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(4), 422–429.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-14