Juridical Review of Provisions on Time Limits for Investigations for General Criminal Actions Regarding the Protection of the Rights of Suspects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v2i11.168Keywords:
Information System, Sales; Website, WaterfallAbstract
The phenomenon of criminal law enforcement today is increasingly losing its direction and is even considered to have reached its lowest point, the justice-seeking community complains about the process of investigating criminal acts (general) which is a convoluted process, protracted and even has no end to its resolution, this situation clearly does not provide legal certainty, justice and benefits in law enforcement, moreover there will be violations of the rights of suspects, one of the causes of this situation is the absence of a provision for the time limit of investigation (vacuum of norms). The research method used in this study is to use the type of Normative legal research with the approach used in this study is a statute approach and a conceptual approach, with the specification of the research is descriptive analytical, while the technique of collecting legal materials used in this study is to use document studies. i.e. documents obtained from the Jatanras Unit of the Source Police Station. Based on the results of the study, it shows that there are no provisions governing the time limit for investigation of suspects from the start of investigation to the transfer of cases to trial, so the status of suspects depends on the investigation process. The absence of a time limit in determining suspects causes legal uncertainty guaranteed in Articles 28D and 281 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution, therefore in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code there is a time limit for investigation as stipulated in article 48 of the Criminal Procedure Bill. Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (3).
References
Abdullah, Abdullah, & Lala, Andi. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hubungan Industrial Melalui Arbitrase Menurut UU Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 5(2), 1–11.
Agustina, Sriastuti. (2016). Peran Penyidik Dalam Melakukan Diversi Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dengan Ancaman Pidana Dibawah 7 Tahun (Study Kasus Di Polres Tulungagung). Yustitiabelen, 2(1), 20–44.
Amandita, Aritztra Arif. (2020). Pemanfaatan Layanan Polisi 110 oleh Command Center untuk Meningkatkan Pelayanan Publik di Polres Banyumas. Police Studies Review, 4(1), 1–56.
Antow, Rudy. (2019). Hapusnya Kewenangan Menuntut Pidana Pembunuhan karena Daluwarsa. Lex Crimen, 8(12).
Besouw, Marco. (2019). Wewenang Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil Melakukan Penyidikan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Di Sektor Jasa Keuangan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Lex Crimen, 8(5).
Caunang, Meyland Iwan. (2017). Kajian Yuridis Penetapan Tersangka Dalam Proses Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Lex Administratum, 5(3).
Helmi, Muhammad. (2016). Ketiadaan daluwarsa penuntutan dalam hukum pidana islam dan pembaruan hukum pidana di Indonesia. Mazahib, 196–207.
Ihsani, Ardli Nuur. (2017). Penerapan Sah-Tidaknya Penetapan Tersangka Sebagai Objek Praperadilan Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dari Perspektif Hak Tersangka. UNS (Sebelas Maret University).
Indonesia, Presiden Republik, & Indonesia, Presiden Republik. (1981). Undang Undang No. 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang: Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.
Koeswanto, Eka Sakti, Riswandi, Riswandi, & Redi, Ahmad. (2023). Implications of Public Trust Due to Weak Law Enforcement Morality. Edunity: Social and Educational Studies, 2(1), 78–86.
Maknunah, Jauharul. (2015). Analisis sistem informasi akuntansi penerimaan dan pengeluaran kas pada lembaga pendidikan. Smatika Jurnal: STIKI Informatika Jurnal, 5(02), 27–39.
Mulyani, Evi Dewi Sri. (2019). Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menggunakan Metode SAW Dengan WP Dalam Pemberian Pinjaman. Cogito Smart Journal, 5(2), 239–251.
Novianti, Regita, & Krisdiawan, Rio Andriyat. (2019). Implementasi Algoritma Floyd Warshall Pada Aplikasi Pengaduan Masyarakat Berbasis Android. NUANSA INFORMATIKA, 13(1).
Palit, Geofani Indra David. (2021). Penerapan Keyakinan Hakim (Conviction In Rasionee) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 10(5).
Rahmi, Atikah. (2019). Pemenuhan Restitusi Dan Kompensasi Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Bagi Korban Kejahatan Seksual Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 140–159.
Trisusilowaty, Dian, Lumbanraja, Anggita Doramia, & Suteki, Suteki. (2019). Fungsi Pengawasan Oleh Inspektorat Pengawasan Daerah Berbasis Pengaduan Masyarakat Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Law Reform, 15(1), 25–41.
Wicaksana, Yuristyawan Pambudi. (2017). Implementasi Asas Ius Curia Novit dalam Penafsiran Hukum Putusan Hakim yang Memutus Sah Tidaknya Penetapan Seseorang sebagai Tersangka. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Zulfan Fathur Rohman, Candra Lesmana, Ruslan Baidhowi Kamal, Agus Dimyati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
