Polemic of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology on the Development of Human Resources, Especially in Legal Practitioners

Authors

  • Jennyola Savira Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta
  • Benny Djaja Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta
  • Maman Sudirman Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v2i10.162

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Legal Practitioner

Abstract

This concern arises because of a new technology that has become a phenomenon known as artificial intelligence machines or Artificial Intelligence (AI) which can be used in various activities, one of which is in the field of law because it can perform artificial intelligence like humans such as thinking, learning, and also self-development. This makes the role of the legal profession in providing legal services questionable. This study aims to determine the results of analysis of Artificial Intelligence (AI) machines that can potentially or not replace the role of legal practitioners and legal responsibility in the use of AI. The writing of this article uses normative research and uses conceptual and legislative approaches. Based on the results of the analysis conducted currently there is no special regulation that expressly regulates AI according to Indonesian law, AI itself is only a machine used in facilitating the work of legal practitioners and AI responsibility is imposed on the creator or user of AI because it is not a legal subject who can carry out legal actions consciously according to applicable provisions in Indonesia

References

Cate, Fred H., Kuner, Christopher, Lynskey, Orla, Millard, Christopher, & Loideain, Nora Ni. (2018). Blockchain versus Data Protection.

Christiawan, Rio. (2022). Aspek Hukum Startup. Sinar Grafika.

Firdaus, Dwi Hidayatul. (2020). Aplikasi Smart Contract dalam e-commerce perspektif hukum perjanjian syariah. Qolamuna: Research Journal and Islamic Studies, 6(1), 37–53.

Haris, Muhammad Tan Abdul Rahman, & Tantimin, Tantimin. (2022). Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence Di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 8(1), 307–316.

Marwan, Awaludin. (2023). Apakah Sarjana Hukum bisa Digantikan dengan Teknologi Kecerdasan Artifisial?

Negara, Perubahan Ketiga Undang Undang Dasar. (2001). Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jakarta, Indonesia: Www. Mpr. Go. Id.

Nomor, Undang Undang. (11AD). Tahun 2019 tentang Sistem Nasional Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi. Lembaran Negara, (6374).

Putra, Revan Ananda. (2021). Akankah Artificial Intelligence Dapat Menggantikan Profesi Pengacara.

Putro, Widodo Dwi. (2020). Disrupsi Dan Masa Depan Profesi Hukum. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 32(1), 19–29.

Rajab, Achmadudin. (2018). Urgensi undang-undang nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang perubahan atas undang-undang nomor 11 tahun 2008 tentang informasi dan transaksi elektronik sebagai solusi guna membangun etika bagi pengguna media. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 14(4), 463–471.

Rayendra, Silvi Lestari, Perdana, Rika Widya, & Yendrizal, Neni Mulyani. (2022). Kecerdasan Buatan. CV. Mitra Cendekia Media.

Simanjuntak, Yoan Nursari. (2023). Hukum Tanpa Jiwa: Kompleksitas Hukum Pasca-Manusia.

Soekanto, Soerjono. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press).

Subekti, Raden, & Tjitrosudibio, Raden. (1999). Kitab undang-undang hukum perdata.

Suriawati, Suriawati. (2019). China Luncurkan Hakim AI untuk Tangani Kasus di Pengadilan Digital.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-25