Notary Responsibilities for the Occurrence of Identity Faketing In the Making of Authentic Deeds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v2i6.112Keywords:
Responsibility, false identity, authentic deedsAbstract
A notary is a public official who is appointed to make authentic deeds and has other authorities as referred to in Article 1 Number 1 Law Number 2 of 2014 on Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 on Office of Notary Public. If there is a negation or denial related to a deed drawn up by a Notary if the documents and/or information obtained regarding the drawing up of the deed turn out to be false, then it is the responsibility of the party who submitted the documents or provided the false identity. This is because the deed contains written statements from the appearers. there is no reason whatsoever for a Notary not to apply the precautionary principle in carrying out his or her position and must uphold the precautionary principle. This implies that all actions taken in the context of drawing up an authentic deed must be in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations so that they can be legally accounted for. In the drawing up of an authentic deed, the Notary must be responsible if the deed drawn up by him or she contains a mistake or an intentional violation by the Notary. Conversely, if the element of mistake or violation occurs from the appearing party, then as long as the Notary exercises his or her authority in accordance with the regulations, the relevant Notary cannot be held accountable because the Notary only records what was conveyed by the parties to be stated in the deedReferences
Amelia, A. P. (2023). Implementasi Pasal 62 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris Terkait Penyerahan Protokol Notaris Di Kota Bandar Lampung.
Ginting, J. B. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Akta Otentik Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris Berisi Keterangan Palsu. Journal Justice, 1(1).
Hardianti, E. P. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Yang Menyuruh Memasukkan Keterangan Palsu Ke Dalam Akta Autentik (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Semarang Nomor 83/Pid/2016/Pt Smg). Indonesian Notary, 4(2).
Kalkhove, B. A., Rohani, S., & Alhadiansyah, A. (N.D.). Upaya Notaris Dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Perlindungan Terhadap Data Penghadap Di Era Digital. Tanjungpura Acta Borneo Jurnal, 1(2).
Komara, S., & Adjie, H. (2023). The Effect of The Execution Of The Sale Of The Right Object On The Position Of Bank Creditors. Edunity: Social and Educational Studies, 2(5), 630–638.
Liem, S. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Jual Beli Saham Tanpa Bukti Pelunasan Dan Bukti Setor (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor: 259/Pdt. G/2017/Pn. Jkt. Sel.). Indonesian Notary, 2(1).
Melinda, S., & Djajaputra, G. (2021). Pembuatan Akta Notaris Di Luar Wilayah Jabatannya Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(7), 3521–3541.
Moertiono, R. J. (2021). Perjanjian Kredit Pemilikan Rumah Dalam Perspektif Teori Perlindungan Hukum. Afosj-Las (All Fields of Science Journal Liaison Academia and Society), 1(3), 252–262.
Negeri, K. D. (2019). Republik Indonesia, Daftar Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri Tentang Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Dan Kdh 2004-2014.
Noer, Z., & Fajriyah, Y. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Protokol Notaris Sebagai Arsip Negara: Arsip Negara, Limitasi, Pertanggungjawaban, Protokol Notaris.
R. Soegondonotori Soerjono. (1993). Hukum Notariat Di Indonesia Suatu Penjelasan . Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rahman, F. A. (2018). Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris Dalam Mengenal Para Penghadap. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Rahmatyah, S., & Sarning, S. (2022). Managemen Pelayanan Kartu Tanda Penduduk Elektronik (E-Ktp) Pada Kantor Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencacatan Sipil Kabupaten Konawe. Jurnal Ilmiah Dikdaya, 12(2), 569–574.
Ramdhan, M. (2021). Metode Penelitian. Cipta Media Nusantara.
Siahaan, K. (2019). Kedudukan Hukum Akta Notaris Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Recital Review, 1(2), 72–88.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Maudy Rahma Pranadia, Gunardi Lie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
