Notary Responsibilities for Making Deeds Based on False Statements (Case Study of Decision Number: 782/PDT.G/2020/PN JKT.SEL)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v2i6.106Keywords:
Notary, Deed, Unlawful Acts, Legal Protection, False SteatmentsAbstract
Notaries are public officials (openbare ambtenaren) appointed by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (KEMENKUMHAM) who have the authority to make authentic deeds. The notary deed clearly explains the rights and obligations of the parties so that the notary deed becomes the strongest and most complete means of evidence because it can prove the truth of its contents compared to a deed made privately. If a Notary as a public official is proven to have made a mistake in the deed they made, then as a result of their actions they can be held accountable both criminally and civilly if it causes a loss. In the case of the South Jakarta District Court decision number 782/PDT.G/2020/PN JKT.SEL a Notary in Tangerang was involved in a civil case of unlawful acts that resulted in the deed’s cancellation. A notary deed that is canceled by a court decision does not mean the result of a notary's mistake in making the deed, but can also be caused by an error or negligence on the part of the parties resulting in a lawsuit because the notary has made the deed in accordance with the regulations. The notary as a public official has the right to refuse not to notify the contents of the deed in accordance with the oath of office they uttered and taking the minutes of the deed and calling the notary must go through the approval of Notary Honorary Council as an institution that has the authority to carry out guidance and supervision of the notary and the existence of the right of refusal. become a form of legal protection for Notaries when carrying out their duties. This study uses normative legal research methods, by analyzing court decisions as the primary legal.
References
Abady, A. R. P., & Rahayu, M. I. F. (2023). Penyuluhan Hukum Pembuatan Akta oleh Notaris Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Journal on Education, 5(2), 4248–4258.
Adjie, H. (2011). Kebatalan dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris, Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Amalia, I. Q. A. (2018). Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Perjanjian dalam Putusan Nomor 1572 K/PDT/2015 Berdasarkan Pasal 1320 dan 1338 KUH Perdata. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune.
Boris Tampubolon, S. H. (2021). Panduan Memahami (Masalah) Hukum Di Masyarakat Agar Tidak Menjadi Korban. Prenada Media.
Fatmawati, N., & Halim, A. J. (2022). Derivasi Bahasa Hukum Mengenai Kebatalan Dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kenotariatan, 6(2), 1226–1231.
Flora, H. S. (2012). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Pengganti Dalam Pembuatan Akta. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 14(2), 179–199.
Fr, M. I. (2021). Batasan Pelaksanaan Hak Ingkar Notaris Dalam Rangka Menjaga Kerahasiaan Akta Menurut Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 4(1), 650–670.
Harahap, Z. (2020). Pembuatan Salinan Akta Berdasarkan Protokol Werda Notaris Yang Telah Diserahkan Pada Notaris Pemegang Protokol.
Madinah, S. (2020). Penerapan Asas Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Pada Penyelesain Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Kotabaru.
Mayra, H., & Simatupang, D. P. (n.d.). Akta Dinyatakan Batal Demi Hukum Oleh Pengadilan: Bagaimana Tanggungjawab Notaris? Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 10, 163–177.
Mulyoto, P. (2012). Tehnik, cara membuat, dan hukum perjanjian yang harus dikuasai. Cakrawala Media, Yogyakarta.
Prabawa, B. G. A. (2017). Analisis Yuridis Tentang Hak Ingkar Notaris Dalam Hal Pemeriksaan Menurut Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Dan Kode Etik Notaris. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 2(1), 98–110.
Sugiannur, S., Imam, W. Z., & Rumkel, N. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri terkait dengan Kompetensi Absolut dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah. Khairun Law Journal, 4(1), 29–42.
Supriadi, S. H. (2023). Etika dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Tanaya, V. (2018). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Informasi Menyesatkan (Misleading Information) dalam Prospektus Go Public. FH UPH Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Eztha Oke Sonia, Mella Ismelina Farma Rahayu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
